Kamis, 30 April 2015

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Instant Camera Review: instant photos

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 review: instant photos in the Instagram age

Do Polaroid-style photos have a place in 2014?

http://bit.do/3YTL



Of all the forms of photography you'd expect to have been sidelined by the smartphone onslaught, instant film would have to top the list. Sure, the unique (and useless) ritual of shaking your pictures to speed up development has a special place in the hearts of many. But the traditional advantages of instant cameras — ease of use, shareability, and the ability to see your photo straight away — are matched point-for-point by the tiny shooter embedded in your phone. Instagram didn't base its logo on a Polaroid Land Camera for nothing.
But that hasn't stopped Fujifilm's Instax cameras from achieving wide success in Asia and beyond, and now the company is gunning for the US with the new Mini 90 camera. “[Instax has] become wildly popular in a lot of the Asian markets and it's a very, very important product to Fujifilm worldwide,” says Bing Liem, Fujifilm’s VP of sales. “It’s been growing very nicely in the US but, based on the population that we have, obviously the penetration should be a lot higher.” Now the company wants to convince Americans that instant cameras are more than just toys.
The Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic Instant Camera — to give it its full name — is Fujifilm’s attempt to appeal to the serious photographer. It features a retro-inspired design with clear nods to Fujifilm's beautiful X-series cameras like the X100S. It also promises to give enthusiasts a higher degree of control over their photos, with more settings and features such as multiple exposure and a bulb mode. If ever there were an Instax camera to break out of the teenage-girl demographic, this would be it. But at $199.99, turning other US customers on to instant film in 2014 may not be the easiest task.
http://bit.do/3YTL
Fujifilm nailed the design of the Mini 90, which fits in both with the traditional, toylike Instax line and the classier X-series. It takes on the basic shape of the former and the visual motifs of the latter, and it’s seriously adorable. "We want to make sure that the photographers of the world understand that it’s a very functional tool with a beautiful form," says Fujifilm’s Matt Schmidt.
The Instax Mini 90 is seriously adorable
Although the Mini 90 is made of plastic, it’s well constructed and the textured materials feel great to the touch. It comes with the same pack-in leather strap as Fujifilm's X-series cameras, which in hindsight I'd recommend using — despite the construction seeming sturdy enough, an accidental drop onto concrete damaged the door mechanism on my unit, making it difficult to latch properly. I'm keeping it closed with a rubber band to avoid ruining the film.
Assuming you're more sensible than I and haven't flung your camera onto the ground, loading Instax film couldn't be easier. The film comes in packs of 10 shots, and it's a case of simply slotting a plastic box inside the camera and closing the door. The camera will automatically eject the protective cover, and then you're good to go. When you press one of the shutter buttons, a blank slide will pop out of a door on the camera's side — that's your photo, and all that's left is for you to watch the colors come into view as the film develops. It's slower, sure, but it's a lot more fun than peeking at a picture on an LCD.
http://bit.do/3YTL
You can use the Mini 90 in portrait or landscape orientation; the camera has a shutter button for each position, ensuring a comfortable grip either way. There are neat little practical touches all over the camera — the front-mounted shutter button doubles as a mirror for accurate selfie framing, and you can select different modes by twisting a ring around the lens as if you were dialing in aperture on an X100. The optical viewfinder is a slight letdown, however, as it’s very small and difficult to view with your eye any further than a few millimeters away; you might have trouble framing your shot if you’re wearing glasses. But precise composition isn’t really what this camera’s about.
The Mini 90's design makes shooting a ton of fun, then, but I was surprised at just how easy it is to get great images. Although Instax film has a fairly light-sensitive ISO of 800, the Mini 90's lens has a small fixed f/12.7 aperture, meaning you'll often be relying on the built-in flash to brighten things up. But it does a remarkably good job of producing natural, great-looking photos — far better than you'd see from most cheap digital compact cameras in similar situations. At around $15 to $20 for two packs of 10 shots, you won’t want to waste any film, which is why it’s so important that the camera perform as you expect. Fujifilm's X-series cameras have built a reputation for excellent automatic exposure with or without flash, though, and that's a trait shared by the Mini 90.
Shooting with the Mini 90 is a little more involved than taking smartphone pictures, but not by much
Shooting with the Mini 90 is a little more involved than taking smartphone pictures, but not by much. You can lighten or darken the image to avoid under- or over-exposure, for example, and while there's no true focus control, the macro and landscape modes hone the lens on close and distant subjects. You can also layer two images on top of one another, or use the bulb mode to produce long exposures in the dark. But given the cost of instant film, most people probably won’t want to experiment too much. Even though the Mini 90 is easy and effective as a simple point-and-shoot camera in spontaneous situations, it does slow you down and force you to think about what you’re capturing. That can be a good or bad thing depending on the kind of photographer you are; some may find it frustrating, but others will enjoy taking the time to figure out what gets the best results. I fell in the latter bucket, as I suspect most people interested in an instant camera will.
Fujifilm is the biggest player left in the consumer film market, and Instax film is surprisingly great. It produces gorgeous, deep — if not necessarily digital-accurate — colors, with skin tones looking particularly good. It’s capable of rendering a lot of detail if you lock in focus with the proper mode. And there's still a special sort of magic to instant photography, even if the first Polaroid camera came out in the 1940s. Instax photos can take up to 10 minutes to fully develop, but you can normally tell if a picture has turned out well within 60 seconds or so, and waiting for the colors to resolve themselves adds to the sense of anticipation. Once developed, you have a one-of-a-kind memento that can’t be recreated or copied any more than a painting can. Instant film makes photography tangible in a way that digital cameras can’t capture.
There's still a special sort of magic to instant photography
One issue that people might have with Instax Mini film is the size of the prints. Fujifilm calls them credit card sized, but that's only partly true — although the paper is about that big, the surrounding border is relatively thick, letting you scribble notes below your image. What you're left with for the actual photo, then, is a bit taller and very slightly narrower than an Instagram photo viewed on an iPhone. That's a convenient size for sharing or slipping into a wallet, but does mean that the camera isn't ideal for capturing sweeping vistas or distant subjects. For now, if you want bigger instant photos, your only modern option is Fujifilm’s colossal and considerably less stylish Instax 210, which uses a separate "wide" format film that’s twice the size and doesn’t fit inside the Mini 90. It’s not the sort of thing you’d want to take on a night out.
http://bit.do/3YTL

Fujifilm Instax mini 90

8.0 Verge Score
Good Stuff
  • Cute design
  • Great image quality
  • Easy and fun to use
Bad Stuff
  • Expensive film
  • Compact print size
  • Small viewfinder
Instant photography is an expensive hobby, but there’s nothing quite like it Fujifilm admits the Mini 90 is a niche product, and in all honesty it’s hard to see it turning many people back on to the joys of instant film. The camera itself is fairly expensive, to say nothing of the per-shot cost. But with Lomography launching its own Instax camera later this year, the potential is there for a minor revival among those who get the appeal. It’s an example of how technological progress sometimes leaves certain joys behind — instant photography may not be for you if you use your camera to document events in great detail, but it might just be your thing if your aim is to preserve and share memories.
No one that picks up a Mini 90 should be disappointed by any facet of its performance. It’s a lovable camera that’s been designed with care and will almost never frustrate you. Instant photography is an expensive hobby, but there’s nothing quite like it — and the Mini 90 is a cute, well-designed way to get started.

The Breakdown

More times than not, the Verge score is based on the average of the subscores below. However, since this is a non-weighted average, we reserve the right to tweak the overall score if we feel it doesn't reflect our overall assessment and price of the product. Read more about how we test and rate products.
  • Hardware / design 8
  • Image quality 8
  • Interface / controls 7
  • Features 7
  • Performance

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Instant Camera Review

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Instant Camera Review - Emma Kay takes a look at Fujifilm's latest instant camera, the Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic.

Category : Film Cameras and Film
Price : £118
Rating :
Share :

Features
Handling
Performance
Verdict
Specification

http://bit.do/3YTL

The Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic is an instant camera that produces 86x54mm photos. It is the highest spec camera in the Instax Mini range, which also includes the Mini 8, Mini 7s, Mini25, Mini 50s and Instax 210. Fujifilm says the Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic has the features of a traditional analogue camera and has an enhanced capability to capture light creatively. We find out how it performs here.

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic Features

The Instax Mini 90 looks like a chunkier version of Fujifilm's classically styled fixed lens cameras. The body is made from plastic and the camera features two shutter buttons, one on the front of the camera in the middle of the power rocker and one on top.

It features a viewfinder and flash and has several modes to suit most photographic opportunities. Pressing the mode button once makes all the possible modes flash, and you can then press mode again until the mode you want is selected, or you can use the mode selector  rocker around the lens barrel of the camera to choose which mode you'd like.

http://bit.do/3YTL

The modes available are:
  • Party - Enables the background as well as your subject to be captured brightly. 
  • Kids - Ideal fro capturing fast moving subjects like children and animals; can also be used in low light conditions.
  • Landscape - Best suited to subjects at a distance of 3 meters to infinity.
  • Double exposure -  Take two images and combine them onto one image
  • Bulb - Hold the shutter button down for a maximum of 10 seconds
Along with the mode button on the back of the camera there are four other buttons. A dedicated macro button prepares the camera for close-up shooting. The L/D button lightens the image when pressed once, lightens it even more when pressed twice, and darkens it when pressed a third time. The self-timer button cam be pressed once for a single exposure or twice if you'd like two photos to be taken in quick succession. The flash button allows you to turn flash on, activate red eye reduction or turn the flash off completely.


Key Features

  • Shoots Instax Mini colour film
  • Flash
  • Macro Mode 
  • Self Timer Mode 
  • 62x46mm images
  • Exposure (remaining shots) counter
  • Max 10 second exposure in bulb mode 

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic Handling

The Instax Mini 90 is quite a chunky camera, and feels strange to hold - there is more grip space on the left of the camera than the right, where the shutter buttons are. The size makes it easy to grip, but there isn't much room for your fingers because the lens is over to the right.

http://bit.do/3YTL

The LCD screens on the back of the camera tell you how many shots you have remaining, and display the mode that the camera is currently in, as well as the battery life, which is handy. The viewfinder is really quite small, meaning that you have to look through it at exactly the right angle, otherwise you can't see through it properly.

The film is easy to load, simply remove the cartridge from the packaging, unclip the door and the cartridge slides straight in. You have to line up a groove on the film pack to the yellow marker inside the camera, then shut the door and away you go. The battery compartment is separate and located on the door of the film compartment, making it easy to recharge the battery without disturbing the film.

http://bit.do/3YTL

The battery is meant to last through 10 film packs, or 100 photos, before it needs charging again according to Fujifilm. This will depend on how long the camera is left for between uses and how often you use the flash.

The camera is quick to spit out the photos, and it's fun to watch them develop.

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Performance

We used one pack of film (10 photos) to test the various modes the camera has and the quality of prints in different situations.

http://bit.do/3YTL

Prints have good colour reproduction, and are sharp without losing the retro feel associated with instant cameras. They are quick to develop, and require no real aid in the process; just wait for your photo to appear. Within about 5 minutes the print should be pretty well developed.



Red eye reduction flash mode seemed to work well in the portrait example, and macro mode enabled a nice photo of the orchid, although there is a minimum focusing distance of 30cm and without any sort of gauge other than your best guess it might be a bit difficult to get the part of the image you want into focus.



Double exposure mode also produced a good result, although the first exposure is a lot more vivid than the second, which is quite ghostly in comparison.



The self timer mode is good, once the shutter is pressed a small red light on the camera turns on for 7 seconds, then flashes for 3 seconds before taking the image, giving you plenty of time to prepare yourself for the shot.

Value For Money

The Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 is available for £117.99 from Amazon. The film is available for £14.30, for 2 packs of 10 shots each, also from Amazon. Film is not badly priced for this model and has nice colour reproduction.

The camera itself is a little on the expensive side for an instant camera, however it does feature a few quite advanced modes that other instant cameras don't have, and it is marketed as the premium model instant camera. Despite being mostly plastic construction the camera feels well built and solid, and has a nice finish, justifying the price tag.

Alternative instant cameras include others in the Fujifilm Instax range, like the Mini 8, which uses the same size film but has less modes, and is available for £52.99 camera only. Another option is a Polarioid model like the 300 Instant Camera, which is priced at £59.99. Film is more expensive for this model however, costing £31.91 for 3 packs.

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Verdict

Overall, the Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 is a good looking instant camera which despite its quirky proportions and awkward shutter button placing is really easy to use.

It produces vibrant prints which are just the right size for a wallet or purse, and these develop quickly. This camera is unique in the features it has, you won't find many instant cameras that have bulb and double exposure modes.

The only drawbacks are the tiny viewfinder which at certain angles can be difficult to see through, and the chunkiness of the model, meaning it's best to stow it in a rucksack or handbag as it will prove difficult to fit into a pocket.

It's trendy and well made so should make a great companion to those who love instant photography and will make use of the extra features this model provides.


Sold by Amazon
The Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 has lots of features and creates colourful prints.

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Pros

Vibrant prints
Settings easy to use
Prints develop quickly
Lots of modes

Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Cons

Chunky - will be difficult to fit in a pocket
Small viewfinder can be difficult to see through

FEATURES
HANDLING
PERFORMANCE
VALUE FOR MONEY
VERDICT



Fujifilm Instax Mini 90 Neo Classic Specifications

ManufacturerFujifilm
Focusing

Focusing modes
Exposure Control

Shutter speeds longestNo Data

ISO sensitivityNo Data
Shooting Options

Continuous shootingNo Data
Power Source

Battery TypeLithium-Ion
Dimensions

Weight296g

Width113.4mm

Height91.9mm

Depth57.2mm

http://bit.do/3YTL





Amazon Fire TV Stick review it might just have replaced my Roku

Amazon Fire TV Stick review: will it beat Chromecast?

http://bit.do/3YQ2

The new Fire TV Stick dongle offers Prime Instant Video alongside Netflix, BBC iPlayer and Sky

The Fire TV Stick, a small video-streaming device that you can plug into your TV set, has quickly become Amazon's fastest-selling gadget.
Amazon's challenge to Google's Chromecast TV dongle costs £35 and streams Amazon's Prime Instant Video as well as Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Sky and Demand 5.
It also gives access to Amazon's huge library of films and TV shows including recent releases such as Interstellar, The Imitation Game and Nightcrawler as well as playing music and a respectable collection of games. So is it any good?
Amazon Fire TV Stick design
Amazon's latest bid to take control of television sets worldwide comes in a small package. The device itself is "approximately the size and shape of a pack of gum", PC Mag says, measuring just 3.3in x 1in x 0.5in.
It plugs into your TV's HDMI port and is powered by a USB cable or mains adaptor.
The device is made from sleek matt plastic with soft, curved edges and feels "somewhat more sophisticated than its rivals", says PC Pro. However "as you won’t be holding it in your hands, or really ever seeing it, it doesn’t matter how it looks tucked away behind your TV".
Amazon Fire TV Stick remote and games
The Fire TV Stick comes with a compact 1.6in x 4.7in x 0.5in remote control which is light but solidly built. Unlike the control that comes with the full-sized version of Amazon Fire TV, the remote does not offer voice search, but it is possible to get voice functionality by downloading the free Fire TV remote app (available for iOS, Android and Amazon devices), which syncs with the TV Stick and offers a range of touch and swipe controls.
A separate games controller is available for £34.99, but the remote functions as a "surprisingly capable" controller in its own right, says games review site Teckish.com.
A simple game like Crossy Road, plays "effortlessly", the site says. Platformers such as Castle of Illusion starring Mickey Mouse can also be played at a stretch, but Sonic The Hedgehog fares rather less well and will probably need Amazon's actual controller to play, Teckish notes.
Still, the selection of games on offer is decent, if not spectacular, says Tech Radar's Nick Pino. "I wish it were a little more AAA game-oriented and much more platform-agnostic (searches only return Amazon content). That said, this is still a fairly balanced ecosystem".
When put head-to-head against the Chromecast and Roku streaming media player, the "Amazon wins hands down", says Pocket-Lint. "Since the launch of the Fire TV set-top box, Amazon has been steadily getting developers on-board in terms of porting games to the platform. Many of the titles available are big name games as well."
The Fire TV Stick's dual-core processor won't be powerful enough to handle some "graphically intensive games" that are currently available for the Amazon Fire TV proper, says Pocket-Lint, but even so, when it comes to gaming the Roku and Chromecast "just don't compete", Pocket-Lint says.
Amazon Fire TV Stick specifications
With a dual-core processor and 1GB of Ram, Amazon Fire TV Stick can stream full HD video. The device also has a feature called ASAP which will buffer shows that it thinks you may be about to watch, so that there is no stuttering once you press play. Still, according to PC Mag, the Fire TV Stick is not as quick as regular Fire TV. "For the smaller size and the lower price of the Fire Stick, you have to trade off the very snappy experience of the Fire TV for a slightly longer wait (but not nearly as long as the Google Nexus Player)", PC Mag says.
Amazon Fire Stick TV content
The Amazon Fire TV Stick is not just a device for people who are already members of Amazon's film and TV subscription service, Amazon Prime. The device also works with Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Sky and Demand 5, as well as Spotify for music. However, for UK viewers, "the lack of Now TV, ITV Player and All 4 support is disappointing", says PC Pro.
Conclusions
Amazon already has a thriving audience due to Amazon Prime having absorbed the popular DVD rental and video streaming service Lovefilm in 2014. Lovefilm had around three million subscribers across Europe, many of whom are still members of Prime.
For those who are already sold into the Amazon ecosystem of movies, games, television and music, Amazon Fire TV Stick is a compelling device to deliver the lot directly to your big screen for less than half the price of the full Amazon TV (£79). For those who are not, reviewers say that this is still a good alternative to Google's Chromecast or Chromebit for streaming subscription services such as Sky or Netflix, as well as for playing music and games.


Products in this article
http://bit.do/3YQ2
Google Chromecast
Amazon$35
Buy now

  
http://bit.do/3YQ2
Amazon’s Fire TV Stick is now available in the UK and Germany, and it might just have replaced my Roku
Amazon’s Fire TV Stick, available in the US since the end of last year, is now available to buy in the UK and Germany for the first time.
It went up for pre-order last month priced at £35, or £19 if you’re an Amazon Prime subscriber, although that deal has now ended. People who pre-ordered should get their devices today.
As well as allowing you to watch Amazon Prime content included with your subscription, or buy titles to keep, there’s also provision for playing back your own content stored on other devices, either by using Amazon’s cloud locker storage services, or via third-party apps like Plex.
That’s not really my requirement, as I stream most content directly nowadays rather than fill up hard drives with things I may never watch again, but it certainly is important for people with huge ‘offline’ collections.
http://bit.do/3YQ2

Convenience is king

Plugged into my TV is a Chromecast, a Roku 3, a Sky+ box, a PS4 and now an Amazon Fire TV Stick. Why have so many plugged in? Because they all seem to be slightly better at one thing than another.
The PS4, when used for watching movies or TV shows, has slightly imprecise controls. The Chromecast is more useful to me whenever I want to do anything in a browser on the big screen, and the Roku has been my go-to streaming device in most circumstances until now.
However, my one irritation with the Roku is fixed with the Fire Stick – it offers both Netflix and Prime streaming in the UK. As a subscriber to both, that’s appreciated. It has Spotify and some other big name apps that you might want too, as does Roku.
For some reason, Prime Streaming still doesn’t exist on Roku in Europe, and that’s a major omission for an otherwise fine platform.
In some ways, I still prefer the Roku. I like the headphone socket on the controller, the UI’s just had an overhaul to make search better and there’s a neat new follow feature for specific titles. However, the Fire Stick will probably see more use in the future for the sheer convenience of having all the services I use in one place.
The Amazon UI has its charms too, and it’s consistent with its mobile and desktop incarnations in overall feel. There was no problem with full 1080p streaming and no jitteriness. It was a tiny bit on the laggy side when navigating between different options and shows though.
Amazon has its own search features too, which you can execute via voice or text commands. For the Stick incarnation, there’s no microphone button (or mic) on the controller, so to use voice you’ll need to install the companion app for Android or iOS devices. Alternatively, if you want the remote with the mic built in, that costs an extra £24.99.
The voice search actually works pretty well out of the box, although the search results themselves left a little to be desired in some cases.
You’ll probably want to check out the Fire TV Stick if gaming is a priority, Roku has gesture controls built into the remote, but Amazon lets you pair up a full-on game controller and has a better selection of games.
http://bit.do/3YQ2
One place where the Roku is ahead of the Fire TV Stick is the mobile app, as it provides an easier way of beaming your own images straight to the TV without needing them to be saved in a specific place — in this case, Amazon’s cloud locker.
Amazon’s Fire TV Stick isn’t perfect — it’s closely tied to Amazon’s ecosystem and you’re constantly reminded that buying shows is a possibility, for example — but convenience goes a long way when the retail price is just £35.


Products in this article
http://bit.do/3YQ2
Google Chromecast
Amazon$35
Buy now










Google Chromecast vs. Roku Streaming Stick: Which Device is better?

Google Chromecast vs. Roku Streaming Stick: Which Device Wins?
By




http://bit.do/3YPa
Roku and Chromecast are streaming devices that stream media onto your television.
Roku is available in both set top models, Roku 3, and in stick versions, Roku 1 and Roku 2. Chromecast is only available in the stick or dongle version. Here, we compare the Roku Stick with Google Chromecast. Both the sticks are functional and cheap and are tiny enough to fit unobtrusively behind your television.

The very popular $35 Google Chromecast and the new $50 Roku Streaming Stick are both vying for an HDMI port on your TV. These sticks look very much alike, but they're actually very different devices that will appeal to different people. Let's look in detail at how the Roku and Chromecast compare, to see which one is the best choice for you.
The Chromecast essentially syncs your TV with what you are watching online from a mobile app or your computer browser (if it's Google Chrome). Technically, it's not streaming directly from your mobile device or laptop Web browser window, but that's what it seems like.
 
MORE: Top 10 Online Streaming Video Services
The Roku Streaming Stick and all Roku Streaming Players are robust devices that have their own apps and their own remotes (for most boxes), and don't require you to be watching the same thing on your handheld device or laptop. The Streaming Stick (as well as the $100 Roku 3) also has the ability to sync with the streams from mobile devices, a la Chromecast, although for fewer apps — just Netflix and YouTube, for now.

Google ChromecastRoku Streaming Stick
Price$35$49.99
Size2.8 x 1.4 x 0.5 inches3.1 x 1.1 x 0.5 inches
Remote controlApp only (iOS, Android)Physical and app (iOS, Android)
Casting capability200+ mobile apps, computer browser tab2 mobile apps
Video quality supported1080p, 720p1080p, 720p
Computer or mobile device needed for playbackYesNo
Casting personal content from mobile devicePhotos, videos and music using a variety of third-party appsPhotos, videos and music using official app
Casting from a computerLimited capability from browser windowN/A
GamesA fewNone (Roku 3 supports games)
Universal content searchNoneAcross 10 sources, including Netflix, Hulu, and HBO GO
Number of channels/apps200+ (most for Android)1,200+
Future channels/appsNone announcedAdding 2-3 per day
Headline apps (sampling)Netflix
Hulu Plus
YouTube
HBO GO
Pandora
Google Play TV, Movies, Music
MLB.TV
VUDU
Crackle
Rdio
PlayOn
Netflix
Hulu Plus
YouTube
HBO GO
PBS
Pandora
Vudu
Amazon Instant Video
MLB.TV
Showtime
Redbox Instant
Disney
Disney Junior
Spotify
Plex
Slacker
rdio
Yahoo Screen

Design

 
The closest comparison between Chromecast and the Roku Streaming Stick is in outward appearance. Each is a roughly 3 x 1 x 0.5-inch dongle-type device with an HDMI connector at one end. However, Chromecast widens at the far end to a circular shape. This probably won't affect the ability to squeeze it into an HDMI port, as it's far enough away from the plug end, on the opposite end of the HDMI port on a TV or A/V receiver. But just in case, Chromecast includes a short HDMI extension cable. At the opposite end of each device is a micro USB port for attaching an included USB charger and cable.
http://bit.do/3YPaOne thing to pay attention is the location of your HDMI ports. If they are on the side of the TV, the Roku Streaming Stick or Chromecast and power cable may extend beyond edge of the TV, ruining the notion of hiding your streaming device. You probably won't have a problem if you have ports on the back of the TV or if you use an A/V receiver with HDMI ports.

Setup

http://bit.do/3YPa
Lacking a remote, Chromecast requires you to perform the setup from a small setup app for Windows and Apple computers or Android and iOS devices. The mobile app is slightly easier to use.
MORE: The Best Chromecast Apps
When you first plug in Chromecast, the device acts as a Wi-Fi hotspot that you connect to your smartphone, tablet or laptop via Wi-Fi. From there, the app asks you to pick the home network to which you would like Chromecast to connect. The remote app sends instructions to the Chromecast, which then connects to your router. You don't install apps on the Chromecast stick itself. Rather, you install your apps on your mobile device that tell Chromecast to download the same video or music that you are streaming on the mobile app.
http://bit.do/3YPa
The Roku Streaming Stick comes with a physical remote, which you'll use to move through setup. The process includes logging in to your Wi-Fi network, setting up an online Roku account and registering your device with your account. You can add apps, called channels, from either the Roku website or the device.
Out of the box, Roku comes with about 30 channels, including Netflix, Amazon Prime Instant Video, Hulu Plus, Spotify and Roku's in-house on-demand video store, M-GO.
In all, Chromecast is slightly easier to set up, as it doesn't require registering an online account.

Interface


Beyond what you see in the setup app, Chromecast has no interface of its own. Instead, you see the interface of the mobile apps that are Chromecast-enabled. The apps are all roughly the same, showing some image of what is playing, plus basic controls such as Play, Pause and a slider that allows you to move ahead or back in the playback of a video or song.
As a standalone streaming device, Roku is far more involved, but not hard to understand. The Home screen shows main-menu items in a column on the left, starting with Channels, which allows you to access the channels you have installed to play video or music. Below are items labeled Movies and TV Shows, but these show only options from a service called M-GO, which shares its revenue with Roku. You don't have to use M-GO. You can also get movies and TV shows from a number of popular services that you install as apps.
http://bit.do/3YPa
The best way to find what you want to watch is with the Search feature. You enter what you are looking for (movie, TV show, actor or director), and Roku searches 10 services: Netflix, Hulu Plus, Amazon Prime Instant Video, Vudu, HBO GO, Redbox Instant, Blockbuster, Crackle, Popcorn Flix and M-GO. That allows you to see if the program is on any of the services you already subscribe to, or if not, to compare prices.
Though more involved, the Roku interface is far better, because you can access all your apps in one place, and the search feature makes the process of looking for content much easier.


Products in this article
http://bit.do/3YN7Google Chromecast
Amazon$35
Buy now
http://bit.do/3YPaRoku Streaming Stick 2014
Amazon$49.99
Buy now

Rabu, 29 April 2015

iPad vs Kindle Fire / Android Tablet for Kids What is the difference and better?

iPad vs Kindle Fire / Android Tablet for Kids

 Kindle Fire HD 7", HD Display, Wi-Fi, 8 GB - Includes Special Offers    Kindle Fire HD 7", HD Display, Wi-Fi, 8 GB - Includes Special Offers
Price
 


@ AmazonApple iPad Mini MD531LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White / Silver) Apple iPad Mini MD531LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White / Silver)

Price
@ Amazon

Which is the best tablet platform for kids iPad or iPad Mini with iOS or a Kindle Fire or other Android-based tablet? I have two young boys and we have both an iPad and a Kindle Fire HD tablet, plus other assorted Android tablets. I thought it would be useful to do a comparison of the two major kinds of tablet from the perspective of children or family use.

In our house both tablets get lots of use by the kids and by me. There's not a clear winner. Many households will want to pick one platform or the other so that apps can be shared across devices. We've taken the alternative approach of having both platforms which gives us access to a wide range of content. This means that we've got good experience with them both.


Price

Now clearly the price of the device is a major consideration. The entry level Kindle Fire HD can be bought for quite a bit less than half the price of an iPad Mini at time of writing. That's a big difference in price.

Of course the iPad Mini has a slightly larger screen at 7.9" to the Kindle Fire HD's 7" screen. And it also has a faster processor, a 5MP camera, video camera and more storage and options to upgrade to larger amounts of storage.

Kindle Fire HDX 7", HDX Display, Wi-Fi, 16 GB - Includes Special Offers Kindle Fire HDX 7", HDX Display, Wi-Fi, 16 GB - Includes Special Offers
Price @ Amazon



We rarely use the camera features of our tablets. Tablets aren't exactly ergonomic for little kids taking photos. I don't encourage my kids to wander around with expensive tablets. But that may be an important feature for you. With the Kindle Fire you'll need to upgrade to the HDX model to get the camera capability and also a higher spec - this is still considerably cheaper than an iPad Mini.

If price is a really big factor for you then the Kindle Fire HD is an excellent choice. These are really good tablets with access to great content (more on that later.) If you're really having to stretch the budget to afford an iPad Mini then you're likely to be very nervous about your kids using such an expensive device and you'll want to add the extended warranty which adds even more to the cost.

iPads are great devices but the Kindle Fire HD is excellent value for money and still a very good choice.

For us, the higher cost of the iPad inhibits how we use it. We often take the Kindle Fire with us on days out so we can use it in the car. We're less likely to take the more expensive iPad. I'm also much more nervous about the kids using the iPad - they need to be sat safely on the couch and not moving around. I'm more laid back about the Kindle Fire so they have more flexibility to say, watch LEGO videos on the floor while they play with their LEGO.

Larger Screen Size Options


Apple iPad with Retina Display MD513LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White) NEWEST VERSION Apple iPad with Retina Display MD513LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White) NEWEST VERSION

Price
@ Amazon
Kindle Fire HD 8.9", Dolby Audio, Dual-Band Wi-Fi, 16 GB - Includes Special Offers Kindle Fire HD 8.9", Dolby Audio, Dual-Band Wi-Fi, 16 GB - Includes Special Offers
Price
@ Amazon




 If you want a larger screen size then the Kindle Fire HD 8.9" (which does have a camera) is excellent value and still much cheaper than an iPad Mini. We've got a full-size iPad which is very good for children's picture books.

Smaller tablets are more portable and tend to be lighter and easier for kids to hold. But bigger screens are better for watching videos and reading books that have pictures in whether they are books for little kids or graphic novels for older kids.

Content

Unless the price is the overriding factor then I think the available content for the devices should be your main decision point. There's no point having a great tablet if it can't run the content your child wants access to.

First there are the apps to consider. In our experience whether you choose iPad, Kindle Fire or another Android tablet there are plenty of great kids apps to choose from. The issue arises if there is a specific app that your child wants or you would like your child to have that isn't available on one of the platforms.

One both platforms there are regular paid kids' apps that become free for a limited period. We've got some great content this way. And the advantage of having both platforms is we can pick up free content on both of them.

For young kids there are more high quality educational apps available for the iPad.  For example my kids have really enjoyed the Mozart's Magic Flute app on the iPad, it's a very niche title and an example of the kind of content that developers may only release for iOS initially or at all.

It's also important to note that the Kindle Fire uses the Amazon App store rather than Google Play and there are titles which have not yet made it to the App store although they are available for Android. This is becoming less of an issue as the Amazon app store gets better populated. We've found plenty to keep kids gainfully occupied on the Kindle Fire.

A key consideration for younger kids for the Kindle Fire is the Freetime Unlimited subscription service which gives access to loads of kid-friendly content for a reasonable monthly fee.

For video content each platform has its own video stores (and selected videos are included in Freetime Unlimited) and the both have NetFlix and Hulu Plus apps. It's worth checking whether you'll be able to access your kids favorite shows.

If your kids are learning to read you might want a children's eBook subscription service like Reading Rainbow. Most of these have an app so it's worth making sure the one you will use is available for your platform. (Reading Rainbow is available on the Amazon app store and for iOS.) To be honest these work best on the larger sized tablets, my kids often found the font-sizes too small on a 7" screen and many of the apps have limited controls for adjusting this.

Once kids are bigger you'll want to this about chapter books. Kindle Freetime Unlimited will give you a good start here. Amazon of course has a wide choice and a Kids book deal of the day which is worth checking. The iPad has iBooks which is well populated. We tend to buy all our eBooks from Amazon and then use the Kindle reader app on the iPad so we can read the books on whichever tablet is available. We also have a Kindle eReader which we can read the same books on.

There's also the Overdrive app on both platforms which allows you to borrow eBooks from your local library. We make good use of this on both tablets.

App Toys and Accessories

App toys are physical toy add-ons that work with a tablet. Some of these are only available for a specific platform - often iOS.

For example there's the Imaginext Apptivity Fortress which is a toy castle that you slot an iPad into. Options for app toys for Android are increasing. The new Angry Birds Star Wars telepods are available for Kindle Fire, Android and iPad.

Plenty of bluetooth keyboards, headphones and speakers are available for both platforms.

Parental Controls

You might expect parental controls to be better on the older iOS platform, but Amazon have put a lot of effort into improving the parental controls on the Kindle Fire. Kindle Freetime allows parents so set up profiles for kids and select which content they have access to and configure time limits for access to particular kinds of content.

User profile support is starting to appear on newer Android tablets too. But it's lacking on the iPad (Apple would like you to buy each family member their own iPad!)

Profiles are important if multiple family members share a tablet. You might be happy for your teenage daughter to read the Hunger Games but would prefer your 8 year old son to wait a little longer!

Both platforms allow parents to set up controls so that kids can't spend money without using a password. (You'll need to do a bit of work to set this up.) There are also controls for Wifi access and other functions.

Robustness


Whichever tablet you choose you're going to want a protective case. Sturdy kid-proof cases are available for both tablets though at time of writing the cases for the brand-new Kindle Fire HD model are just starting to appear.

There are large tough cases for small kids and brightly colored cases for older kids. We use regular cases that stay on the tablets during use. We also have rules for using the tablets and what to do with them when finished. My kids are fairly careful. For younger kids and the accident prone it's worth getting a good protective case so that you're comfortable with your child making good use of the tablet.

Summary


My kids aged 5 and nearly 7 both move happily between the Kindle Fire HD and the iPad depending on which is available and what activity they want to do.

One key point is that the Kindle Fire doesn't feel like a poor relation to the iPad. The iPad is a great tablet but it doesn't feel a long way ahead of Android any more. For example, I find the Amazon app store much easier to navigate than the Apple one.

To my ear, the sound is actually better on the Kindle Fire HD than the iPad. And I prefer the physical controls on the Fire.

As I've said, the cost of the iPad means that we're much more cautious of letting the kids use it and taking it out with us! This means that the Kindle Fire gets more day to day use by the kids.

The Kindle Fire HD or Kindle Fire HDX is much better value for money than an iPad. But when it comes to high quality niche educational apps the iPad currently shines. It's great to have it available to get access to those apps.

One set up to consider is for the adults in the house to have an iPad which is occasionally borrowed by the kids. And to get the kids a less expensive Kindle Fire HD which is theirs to use with more freedom. 

We've gone with a small portable 7" Kindle Fire HD and a 9.7" iPad which is great for books and apps where you want to see more detail.

Kindle Fire HD 7", HD Display, Wi-Fi, 8 GB - Includes Special Offers Kindle Fire HD 7", HD Display, Wi-Fi, 8 GB - Special Offers
Price
 



@ AmazonApple iPad Mini MD531LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White / Silver) Apple iPad Mini MD531LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White / Silver)

Price
 




@ AmazonApple iPad with Retina Display MD513LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White) NEWEST VERSION Apple iPad with Retina Display MD513LL/A (16GB, Wi-Fi, White) NEWEST VERSION
Price
@ Amazon
 Kindle Fire HDX 7",  Kindle Fire HDX 7", 



HDX Display, Wi-Fi, 16 GB - Special Offers
Price




@ AmazonKindle Fire HD 8.9", Dolby Audio, Dual-Band Wi-Fi, 16 GB - Includes Special Offers Kindle Fire HD 8.9", Dolby Audio, Dual-Band Wi-Fi, 16 GB - Special Offers
Price
@ Amazon